close
close

Blockchain governance models: How decisions are made on blockchains

Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 11 July 2024, Blockchain technology, hailed for its decentralized nature, still relies on governance systems to make decisions about protocol development, regulations and other possible governance issues. The effectiveness of governance models can significantly impact network performance, security, and scalability. Let’s explore this in more detail.

Standard control types

There are three control types: on-chain, off-chain and hybrid. The former includes making decisions directly on the blockchain, allowing token holders to vote on proposals. This model offers transparency and efficiency as its main advantages. Every decision is securely documented in the blockchain, creating a transparent and easily accessible record of governance-related actions. In addition, the suggestions are automated, which simplifies the process and saves time and resources required to implement changes.

Despite its advantages, this type also presents some disadvantages, the most important of which is possible low levels of participation, which can compromise the fairness and efficiency of governance. In addition, it can lead to centralization problems, which harms the blockchain’s core idea of ​​decentralization.

The second model of blockchain governance is off-chain. As can be seen from its name, this governance model is based on discussions and votes that take place outside the blockchain (on forums, social media, specifically created platforms or even offline). First, stakeholders participate in informal discussions to debate and agree on submitted changes. The approved changes are then implemented by developers and miners or validators.

This model offers several noticeable advantages, including improved flexibility and inclusion. Off-chain governance offers the advantage of more refined and adaptable decision-making processes, allowing for a diversity of viewpoints and opinions. In addition, it facilitates wider community involvement, which hopefully results in more comprehensive and representative decision-making.

Still, this model isn’t perfect. The informal off-chain governance can lead to long discussion and voting periods due to the lack of established formal procedures and guidelines. Additionally, it can be difficult to coordinate off-chain efforts, as consensus-building efforts can result in protracted disputes and even hard borders if a solution is not reached in time.

Finally, a hybrid control model combines elements from previous systems to exploit their advantages. For example, initial decisions can be made through off-chain discussions and then moved to on-chain voting, or vice versa. This adaptable approach allows hybrid models to strike a balance between flexibility and inclusiveness. Consequently, it ensures that decision-making procedures are clear while embracing a variety of perspectives and contributions. In addition, implementing hybrid governance can help reduce centralization by engaging a much wider range of supporters and voters.

The challenges associated with hybrid control should also be evaluated. Monitoring a hybrid model can prove more complicated than conventional governance setups, as it involves coordination of on-chain and off-chain mechanisms. In addition, it can be demanding not only in terms of resources but also time, significantly prolonging decisions in some cases.

Current challenges

One of the central challenges facing blockchain contributors is achieving the appropriate balance between decentralization and efficiency in decision-making. Highly decentralized models often face challenges in reaching consensus quickly, while more strict models can be effective but may compromise decentralization to some extent.

Second, it is necessary to guarantee equal representation of all involved parties, such as developers, miners, validators and users, to protect both inclusiveness and decentralization of blockchains. In addition, the governance framework should include procedures for resolving conflicts and disagreements, because the more people involved in governance, the more arguments can arise.

Third, the expansion of blockchain networks requires that governance models also expand to handle the larger number of voters and more elaborate decision-making methods.

The final prominent challenge is to ensure transparency and increase user trust and loyalty. Even with the off-chain model, documentation of decisions and their reasoning on accessible platforms can improve accountability for both management and governing processes.

Final words

Governance is critical to the long-term success and resilience of blockchains. Without it, even the most promising projects can lose their potential and fade into oblivion. The more mature and multifaceted the crypto industry becomes, the more firm yet flexible governance must be to ensure the robustness, security and adaptability of the projects within.

Kinetex network: Website | Kinetex dApp | Blog

Back To Top